Author Guidelines

Review of International Economy and finance (RITEF) is published once a mont  and serves as a peer-reviewed journal specializing in field research and literature review related to Economics, Accounting, Management, business . Its aim is to offer readers a better understanding of Economics, Accounting, Management, business and to present progress through the publication of research articles and reports, which include field studies and literature reviews. This journal invites scholars and experts working in all fields of science Economics, Accounting, Management, business. Articles must be original, based on field research and literature, have never been published before, and are not being considered for publication in other journals. All submitted papers will be reviewed by the Editor, editorial board, and blind reviewers. Submissions that violate our format or length guidelines will be rejected without review.

Writing Format
Writing Organization
Articles using Microsoft Word software (MS.Word) 2010-2013 (or later) in A4 size, then the text is typed in 1.15 spaces. Candara-based font 12pt and one column. List references using a reference management tool (Zotero or Mendeley). The reference list is arranged alphabetically according to the 17th Edition of the Chicago Manual of Style (Author's Date). Furthermore, the manuscript is about 10-20 pages long, with the top, bottom, left, and right margins equal 3 centimeters (3 cm). The results and discussion sections can be added with subtitles written in Cambrian font 12 and in bold, new paragraphs are written in, between paragraphs are not given a space.

Title
The title of the scientific paper must be written in a minimum of 10 words and a maximum of 15 words in Indonesian or English. After the title, followed by the inclusion of the author's full name without abbreviation (does not include academic degree), the identity of the department (choose one: Faculty/Study Program/Bureau/Division) from the nearest line in the author's hierarchy, line position and separate commas (, ) followed by identity institution (you can choose one: University/Institute/SMA/Institution/Institution) where the author works, then include the email address as a medium for correspondence between the reader and the author at the bottom of the first page.

Abstract
The summary of research results, field studies, and literature are relatively straightforward, without overly detailed explanations. The abstract typeface is Cambria with font size 12pt in 1 (one) paragraph and contains a minimum of 150 to a maximum of 200 words; the digest is accompanied by a maximum of 5 (five) keywords or phrases and must contain: (1) Background, research problem ; (2) research objectives; (3) The research method used; (5) Research results; (6) Research conclusions in achieving research objectives.

Introduction
It contains a research introduction with 25% or about 4 (four) pages of the complete manuscript. Contains background problems, research problems, research problems (problems), a clear literature review, and research objectives.

Research Method
The research basis or research principles have a proportion of 12% or about 2 (two) pages of the complete manuscript. It covers the research paradigm, the type of research conducted, data collection techniques, and data analysis.

Results and Analysis
The essence of the findings of this study has a proportion of 38% or about seven (7) pages of the complete manuscript. It discloses research results, containing tables, graphs, and figures interpreted and described with the relevant literature (if deemed necessary).

Conclusion
The final part of this research report has a proportion of 7% or about 1 (one) page of the entire manuscript. Conclude research that can represent the main findings and has meaningful recommendations.

References
The final part of this research report has a proportion of 12% or about 2 (two) pages of the complete manuscript. She reflected the adequacy and novelty of the reference literature by prioritizing scientific journals (80%) as the basis for a minimum of 12 citations.

Publication Ethics
The Editor of the Review of International Economy and finance (RITEF) is responsible for deciding which submitted articles should be published in the journal. The validation of the work and its significance to researchers and readers should consistently drive this decision. The Editor may be guided by the editorial board's policies and is constrained by legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The Editor may consult with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor evaluates manuscripts at all times for their intellectual content regardless of the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality
Editors and any editorial staff may not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the respective authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished material disclosed in submitted manuscripts may not be used in the Editor's research without the author's written consent.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer reviews assist editors in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communication with authors can also assist authors in improving papers.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that an immediate review is impossible must notify the Editor and withdraw from the review process.

Confidentiality
Any manuscript received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the Editor.

Standards of Objectivity
The review must be done objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument has been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. Reviewers should also call the Editor's attention to any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers they have personal knowledge of.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest resulting from a competitive, collaborative, or other relationship or connection with the author, company, or any institution with which the paper is related.

Duties of Authors:
Reporting standards
Authors of the original research report must present an accurate account of the work done and an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately on paper. A paper must contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are required to provide raw data concerning the paper for editorial review and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if possible, and under any circumstances. Be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if the authors have used the work and words of others, then these have been appropriately cited or cited.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications
An author may not generally publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or significant publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal simultaneously constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, conduct, or interpretation of the reported study. Everyone who has made significant contributions should be listed as a co-author. Others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project; they must be recognized or listed as contributors. Correspondence authors must ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have approved its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment that have unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify these in the manuscript.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that may be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, he must immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the Editor to retract or correct the paper.